02.06.01
On Gramsci:
- Relationship between
class conflict and revolution
- Marx understands
the dialectic as straight-forward and inexorable
- Gramsci suggests
that the conflict between classes may be revolutionary or reactionary
- Role of intellectuals:
- Marx sees as part
of bourgeoisie; doesn't really discuss
- Gramsci sees the
intellectual as a potentially revolutionary force, when she breaks away
from the bureaucracy
- Bonapartism/Caesarism
- For Marx, Bonapartism
is a completely counter-revolutionary force; the way that the revolutionary
drives of the proletariat get undermined by the bourgeoisie
- For Gramsci, Caesarism
is instead a compromise between the revolutionary and the reactionary;
the question is not how the Caesarist figure "takes" control,
but rather how the masses are led to consent to that control
- Fable of the beaver
- In Marx, the proletariat
is wholly dominated by the capitalists, who ruthlessly seek to alienate
and destroy them
- In Gramsci, the
proletariat seem to inflict some measure of their own damage
- Hegemony and ideology
- In Marx, the ruling
ideas are the ideas of the ruling class
- In Gramsci, ideology
is a process, a constant struggle, in which the ruling class attempts
to maintain control, and the ruled attempt to subvert that control
Benjamin
- Interplay between ownership
and access of art, information
- Advent of new technologies
creates a crisis for the proletariat; technology has the potential to liberate
culture from traditional values, but it also has the potential to enslave
the viewer into ideology
- Aura = authenticity,
cult value, ritual value, heavily based on inaccessibility to general public;
reproduction destroys the aura, turns art into consumer item
- Importance of seeing
art in "natural habitat"; change of location changes something about
art
- The more things are
reproduced, the more aura is destroyed, and the more the artist is separated
from his/her work
Adorno & Horkheimer
- People with the money
are in charge of dispersing ideas, do so with economic view in mind
- proletariat being taught
how to think and act by the culture industry
- resistance is "incorporated";
conformity is necessary; deviation is gobbled up by higher powers; industry
creates or anticipates niche markets
For next time:
Everybody read both of
the Althusser essays carefully.
Select, at least tentatively,
one of the concepts we've considered so far that you're interested in (such
as ideology, reification, hegemony, revolution, contradiction, etc.). Make notes
on the development of that concept in Althusser. Note particularly any differences
between the two essays in their treatment of the concept.
Also, to continue this
work with Benjamin/Adorno & Horkheimer: decide which of these essays seems more
in line with the thinking of "your" position. We'll continue our debate
next time.