Skip navigation.
Home

in a staring contest between me and the computer, I'm going to lose.

| |

So, like Shock and Awe, I was thoroughly seduced by Kind of Blue. Which means that I spent a couple hours glued to the computer screen, and towards the end of that time, I was pretty sure that my eyes were going to fall out.

And let's be clear: I am no computer-screen-staring lightweight. My summer/winter break job=eight hours a day sitting in a cubicle staring at a computer screen. One of my hobbies involves writing jibberish (code) in a text editor. I blog, I scour four or five news sites every day, and Facebook kind of owns me.

But during the summer, my internet-surfing time drops precipitously. When I'm working all day at a computer, the last thing I want to do when I get home is...sit at the computer. I come home and I go for a walk or cook something or read a book or, at the least, watch television--anything that keeps me more than twelve inches away from that glowing screen.

This, to me, is a serious potential problem with electronic literature, because I know I'm not the only one whose eyes get sore after a few hours in front of the computer. Reading a book is just easier on the eyes. It's a pretty pedestrian complaint, I know, but I think it's a legitimate one. People can only spend so many hours a day at their desks, and we've got to be close to the upper limit.

Okay. All of that aside, I just wanted to point out one line from Kind of Blue:
Someday you'll have to explain to me, or provide for my reading, or viewing, etc. how all these tendentious jigsaw pieces could conceivably fit together.

Sometimes I feel like that's our whole project here, with a lot of the things we're reading. All of these blog entries feel like tiny pieces of a billion-piece jigsaw puzzle, scraps of physical reactions and emotional attachments and complaints and commentaries. Like the wiki--I keep waiting for it to develop into some sort of cohesive whole.

What I thought was great

What I thought was great about Kind of Blue, among other things, is that you could form your own reading experience of the text. You could click on emails only to and from Susanne, focusing almost entirely on the love story, or you could read only the Ernesto/Berto correspondence. Same goes for most of the independent characters and their own story lines. Within each set is an entire story, but one that hints of other stories, which get you to explore those storylines. But this text does not have to be explored sequentially, but unlike some of the floaty, dreamy hypertexts where you were bounced around out of order and out of body, this one you had control of the way you read it. I quickly identified the main themes, and read by theme, which I thought was cool that I could do that.