Skip navigation.
Home

Hypertext Composition process

| |

I'd like to call attention to an important comment Lulu made to my recent post about hypertext composition method. She discusses how ideas develop during and out of the process of writing -- an idea that I think doesn't get enough play in discussions of writing process and poetics, perhaps because some of us (like me) find it difficult to pin down and analyze. She mentions preferring non-visual modes of operation. This interests me because I think my own extensive and reflexive dependence on visuality may tend to lead me into analyzing things, including Websites and hypertext narratives, as static or non-temporal -- something that might be applied to Patchwork Girl and Victory Garden, for instance, which use spatial, nontemporal metaphors for narrative.

I've heard things that seem like this referred to as "dialogic" consciousness or method. Bakhtin writes about this, but doesn't seem too interested in minutely examining how the consciousness itself works or how a dialog evolves between an author and an expanding work.

I would be particularly interested in knowing how people who don't like diagrams and so forth model writing and narrative projects. Of course, models tend to be visual or spatial, so model may be the wrong word, but it would be interesting to find what kind of metaphors and processes work for people. It might tell us all a lot about process.

the writing process

There are so many vastly different ways that we think about the writing process. I have been thinking about this recently as the due date for my comprehensive thesis outline comes very near. I have a hard time with assignments like this because, unlike others, I am not a diagraming, outlining kind of writer.

It may seem a little whimsical, but I tend to think that we don't really know what we're going to write about until we start the writing. Often, I start writing a paper toward one conclusion, or maybe even without a conclusion in mind, and, somewhere in the middle, I hit my stride and I find what I'm really writing about.

Generally the best I can do as far as modeling goes, is start with an extremely rough, sparse outline but even then, there's no guarantee my finished product will vaguely resemble it.

writing process

I don't think this is whimsy at all, although I must say I usually find the experience you're talking about a good reason to go back and revise the first part of a draft. In a sense the idea doesn't exist until written.

There's a Frank O'Hara poem called "Oranges" and a Henry Miller story/essay called "The Angel is my Watermark" that address this.

On the other hand, some idea exists before, however it may change, and the idea that eventually arrives may never do so without the floundering that goes before.

So how do you find one flounders well?