Skip navigation.
Home

Hypertexts and Closure

|

I admit that I am one of the people who has been annoyed by the lack of closure in many of the hypertexts we have been reading. While the lack of closure sometimes works, and the idea of a "perpetually unfinished textuality" intrigued me, I often grew frustrated with reading experiences that seemed to leave me wandering in circles. I can't say that I have exactly changed my mind about any of these things, but I have gained a great deal of sympathy for hypertext writers while working on my own final project. How (or if) I am going to write a conclusion or conclusions to this thing I do not know.

Furthermore, the writing process itself seems to be perpetually unfinished. There is always another page to write, another story line to be added, another page to link. I have personally found the process of putting together a hypertext to be incredibly addictive. I find myself neglecting more pressing homework to add page after page to my project. However, I have no idea how I am going to know when I am "done." I hope that I find the strength to stop working on it before the project deadline wrests the thing out of my hands and forces me to stop!

Hypertext writing process, closure, cycles, writing process

Tough problem.

This seems to work differently in every given piece, but I've begun to look for a cycle of some sort. What sort? I don't know, offhand. So far this hasn't happened the same way twice. But when events come close to repeating, people seem to consider that the end of a phrase, a stanza, a song, an essay, an epic, a story, a year, a decade, an epoch.

Happy hunting.

That exact same "problem" is

That exact same "problem" is why hypertext writing is so exciting and, like you said, addictive. I don't really think there is an end/closure when writing hypertexts because every word, place, character can have a backstory, and it all depends on the author(s) whether that backstory will be explored or not.

For my hypertext final project, I've written lots of pages and linked even more words. Every time I come up with a new place, I link that word as a potential new entry, but the problem is, will I have the time to give all these new links/places/characters their own stories behind the main frame? The whole project has seemed like an infinitely expanding one, much more so than writing a book. When writing a book, there's also the problem of linearity and making sure you don't all of a sudden go off on tangents. This hypertext writing process, though, totally encourages that, and the problem is to be able to do the text and backstories justice within our time constraints.

Another thing that I thought about was how the hypertext process could potentially discourage imagination for the reader. Well, I guess in a sense what I just said isn't true because there's an infinite number of things in any text that can be toyed with in the reader's imagination. What I meant to say, though was that if we theoretically managed to link every character/place and gave everything a backstory and background (which is theoretically possible in a hypertext), then we wouldn't leave anything to the reader's imagination. When reading books, I personally like wondering about certain things that the author doesn't mention or explain. For example, when I read Harry Potter, I have a million questions about minute details in the text which JK Rowling hasn't explained, but I can think of possible explanations in my head. Then again, maybe I'm being silly because there's an endless amount of imagination that once can put towards reading any text, including hypertexts.

Good luck and have fun writing!

whoa

Your comment: "if we theoretically managed to link every character/place and gave everything a backstory and background (which is theoretically possible in a hypertext), then we wouldn't leave anything to the reader's imagination" reminds me of the ideal picture of the world wide web that was mentioned in one of our readings somewhere--I think the guy that invented the web (no, not Al Gore! Tim Burners-Lee or something like that) had a vision that every word on an internet page would be a link, connecting to another page, also full of linked words.

Just picturing a page of totally linked text gives me a headache. Reading such a thing would be totally unmanageable--at least to those used to thinking in a (moderately) linear fashion...