Redefining Literature

I thought it was cool how Janet Murray really thought out unique ways that the computer could tell a story, epitomized in the three versions of a tragic suicide that she gave: "mind as tragic labyrinth" (176), "web of mourning," (177) and "simulation and destiny" (178). I think it would be a very interesting experience to occupy all those points of view for one situation--first person, third person other character, and omniscient third person. Having the power to enact some sort of chanage (while being omniscient) is further engaging because you contribute. The one that got me most was the "mind as tragic labyrinth" because it recognizes the fundamental connection between a computer's programming and how our brains are configured. For example, Murray talks of blocked off or fading happy memories. Memories do actually got blocked, such as in people who are traumatized. Unlike a stream-of-consciousness novel, digital narrative could actually simulate this neurological activity. I must admit that, as much as I am frustrated by disorienting experimental stuff like this (or like Michael Joyce's "Afternoon"), I do think this literature is uniquely beneficial in the end. It's an experience, not an analysis, and once I realize that, I can enjoy it more. Yeah! I think I'm caught up on my blogs for a while!