Skip navigation.
Home

Speaking of Re-mixing

|

I don't pretend to be hipster enough to know really anything about this, but isn't the type of remix that in the New Media article DJ Tim Simenon is talking about now called a mash-up? Is that what we're calling it these days?

Anyhow, from what I've heard, mash-ups are kind of amazing and kind of rock my world. They aren't much different from what Manovich is describing except instead of manipulating a single track with an anonymous extra beat or mixing around one artists' track and turning it into a more upbeat or slower version, mash-ups instead mix two tracks by usually very very different artists in ways that present the best of both tracks. The first one I heard was on the radio this summer and it was Gnarls Barkley and the Raconteurs, a mash-up of "Crazy" and "Steady as she Goes" and named, appropriately, "Crazy as she Goes". So I heard this and thought, you know, that this was just a crazy and kind of cool endeavor one DJ embarked upon until I discovered Girl Talk. Girl Talk is a little bit different because he [yeah, it's just this one dude, crazy right], as Pitchfork so succintly put it, "crams six or eight or 14 or 20 songs into frenetic rows, slicing fragments off 1980s pop, Dirty South rap, booty bass, and grunge, among countless other genres. Then he pieces together the voracious music fan's dream: a hulking hyper-mix designed to make you dance, wear out predictable ideas, and defy hopeless record-reviewing". Sooo it's a few more than two songs, but it's still equally incredible. If you want to see a video of this man in action (who will also be in action next semester in Dom's Social Room!!!), check out this video.

I'd appreciate a bit more talk about this, just because I don't know that much about the genre, so if anyone has any valuable information to share with me, I'd definitely appreciate it!

The Nature of the Mash-up

Wow, Ashley, you really set me up for nice little post here, as Girl Talk is one of the featured artists in my thesis at the moment. Also, one quick observation after watching those videos you linked too. It was interesting seeing how he both altered and adhered to our construction of a musical performer. He was really just screwing around with his computer on a stage. He still danced quite a bit and interacted with his audience a tremendous amount, but his instrument was the same thing I'm using to type this response - a very nontraditional instrument at best. The moment for me that really highlighted this odd situation was during his cover of the Nirvana song where he ran off into the back of the crowd. As a musician, I can't tell you how many times I've wanted to do something like that, but been constrained by the physical limitations of the instrument I've been playing. The computer appears to allow the artist a level of interactive freedom with his/her audience (are we touching on Manovich yet?) that we've never seen before. But equally as interesting to me is to witness the response of the crowd at the front of the stage when Girl Talk leaves it. The precarious balance that the performer/artist has been executing is suddenly shattered as everyone realizes that they are simply dancing around a computer, and why couldn't they do this on their own? The dancing gets listless and their gazes follow the performer to the back of the room since the stage is so utterly visually inert. Then Girl Talk returns and the crowd is reinvigorated either reminded or deceived once again that there is a concert going on. However you want to look at it.

As for mash-ups, I'm surprised you only encountered them this past summer. My understanding is that the first ridiculously popular mash-up, which defined the genre (of mixed genres), was done in 2001 by Freelance Hellraiser. It was a mix between The Strokes (I think it was "Hard to Explain") and "Genie in a Bottle" by Christina Aguilera, entitled "A Stroke of Genius." From there the genre took off. One of my favorite mash-up artists is 2 Many DJs, whose combination of U2 and Eminem in "With or Without Me" indicated to me the sheer awesomeness available. Mash-ups are becoming more than two recognizable simultaneous cultural references - they are truly becoming their own artistic entities. I'm sure you're also familiar with the infamous Grey Album, the combination of Jay-Z's Black Album and the Beatles' White Album. I've also heard Jay's Black Album with Weezer's Blue Album, but it's not nearly as good. The problem with most mashups is that they tend to be too gimmicky. Q-Unit is some anonymous guy who mixed 50 Cent songs with Queen songs. It works on a couple of tracks, but the gimmick gets old over the course of a full album.

This is one reason why Girl Talk works so well. He abandons the notion that you're humorously combining two songs as some sort of joke (certainly Freelance Hellraiser's initial ambition). Instead he cuts and pastes pieces as they fit. He doesn't rely on the structure of any pre-existing song he's using. His borrowed elements are so short in most cases that no discernible structure can be determined from the elements themselves. Instead, he creates mashed-up tracks that utilize dozens of different components. Some of his most incredible moments are more traditional mash-ups (Notorious B.I.G.'s "Juicy" over the top of Elton John's "Tiny Dancer" comes immediately to mind) but they don't last over the course of songs and there's no gimmick - it just works. I think he's done/doing wonders for legitimizing the mash-up as its own genre form. And it definitely problematizes our notions of authorship. So thanks for bringing that one up Ashley, and any time you want to listen to some mash-ups, let me know.