Skip navigation.
Home

Just throwing this out there

| | |

Okay, so I'm sure that someone has written about Borat, but I can't find it to attach this to their blog, but I'm going to tie it in with Parental Control, so I figure I'll probably say something slightly new to the blog.

I'm sure that many of you have seen the Borat movie, but I'll still try not to give anything away. And I hope that many of you have seen Parental Control, because after Yo Momma it is the best reality show on television. For those of you who are unfamiliar with its genius, the plot is that there are two parents who are ridiculously unhappy with their son or daughter's significant other. So they interview a slew of willing candidates, choose two of them and then sit at home with the unhappy significant other, watching the son or daughter go on televised dates with the new candidates. After the two dates, the son or daughter has to choose between staying with his or her current significant other or taking one of the new candidates. The show makes me feel ridiculously trashy sometimes, but I can't help loving it. Sometimes I'll even skip meals to stay home and watch it on MTV. I often think to myself, "Why do you like this show?" I think it's because I'm convinced it's not actually real.

The people on the show seem like caricatures. They have great comebacks and their hearts don't actually break. Unlike Laguna Beach, where the characters make me sad because they're so believable, I don't feel anything here because I don't feel like I'm watching real people. I can never figure out the nature of the relationships on the show. Are they actors? Are those actually their parents? Or their girlfriends? Everything feels so staged (and I know it must be to a degree) but where is that line drawn? And where is it crossed? How much of it is actually real? And most importantly, does that even matter?

Which brings me to Borat. Because it's clear that many people feel that the level of reality matters greatly. You've probably heard by now that those frat boys are suing Sasha Baron Cohen for defamation of character. They claim that a random film crew took them out drinking one night and sent them on an RV, and then unbeknownst to them Borat showed up. What ensued appears in the film, with the frat boys really drunk and saying racist and sexist things every other sentence. I suppose they're contending that they were tricked into defaming their own character or something. The implication is certainly that the footage is presented as being "real" but it isn't. So where is the line drawn? Those frat boys actually said all of the words that came out of their mouths. What does it matter if they were facilitated in doing so? Does it become any less genuine or realistic? And furthermore, at what point do the characters on the screen stop being real people and start being characters? In Parental Control, I don't feel like I'm watching real people and in Borat I do. And it drastically alters how I go about watching the shows. I guess I just wanted to bring up the questions rather than provide real questions to it. And if anyone knows anything about how Parental Control is made, please let me know...or maybe don't. Because part of the fun is in the guessing.

Blog stealer

So I too came out of Borat wondering the exact same thing. I had never watched the Ali G show prior to seeing the movie so I didn't really know much about his whole routine. I kept thinking in the movie, "this can't be real, this can't be real," but at the same time thinking, "if this is staged, it is some of the best acting I have ever seen." It got me wondering how the actual process works. Since nobody in their right mind would likely agree to let themselves be seen in such an unfavorable light in front of international audiences, I assumed that it was either staged, or the participants were widely deceived by the producers of the movie. I assumed that it was only a short matter of time before multiple law suits would be filed.

This got me to thinking about whether or not the actual "reality" of the footage matters. I think that is does. Take for example the rodeo sequence when you see red America basically cheering for the bloodshed in Iraq. This scene is a whole hell of a lot more powerful (and scary I might add) when you realize that these people weren't in on the plot. Yikes.

Furthermore, a little info on the Parental Control front. I have a friend at school that was just recently on the show. It just aired a couple of weeks ago. You've probably seen the episode if you are the avid watcher that you claim to be. Anyway, moral of the story is that it is a total sham. Well at least in Kyle's case. His "girlfriend" was his younger sister's best friend. His parent's agreed to do the show only if she was the "girlfriend." So all of the banter that takes place between Kyle's parents and the girlfriend was obviously staged. The filming is all out of order too. However, they do actually go on dates and the date really does pick what they do and at the end of the show- Kyle was able to pick whoever he wanted. He chose the girlfriend for obvious reasons and the show ended with their kiss which is creepy on several levels, especially if you are Kyle's little sister. I can only imagine that many of the other Parental Controls are set up in a similar fashion, not exactly the reality we all hope it is.

oh. my.

I knew it! I knew that the parent and gf/bf banter had to be staged, because no one on that show seems quick-witted enough for such fast-paced insulting (no offense to your friends, of course). Plus, how many parents are hip enough to think of those insults? Not many, I tell you, not many. Some of those parents could be on "Yo Momma"! In any case, I'm glad to read that my suspicions were true.