Hey all, Here's an interesting article I found about Wikipedia's use by legal courts in America. It seems like many courts and judges actually rely on wikipedia quite often for what appears to be more than trivial facts. I must say I'm really surprised. However, the article claims that when Wikipedia was used it is generally to look up colloquial terms that Britannica would not have. "Booty Music" is a good example of term/phrase that a judge appealed to Wikipedia for. I think it makes some sense to appeal to Wikipedia for common-language terms like this which are not defined in more scholarly encyclopedias.
also, I found this article on Digg.com which is another social software tool. Digg organizes news articles, videos and podcasts based on user recommendations. Check it out if you have time.
I don't really care, I just want to feel special. Here it was in my comment.
Does something like this actually matter? I mean, does the first person to find an article or link have special rights to it?