Though there have been several death scenes laced with humor, I found Clipperton's suicide to be one of the novel's least humorous thus far. I remember there was a section before page 435 talking about the human incapability of dealing with achieving an ideal, I think it may have involved Schtitt's philosophies, but does anyone think they might know what I'm talking about?
I saw/ the novel made some parallels between Clipperton and NaCN-Quik kid (blue-faced suicide technique 437), there were both subject to "unprepared-goal-attaintment-trauma" (437). Clipperton's No.1 ranking is the result of inprobable bureaucratic shuffling, but it's unclear how NaCN-Quik kid suffered from this, any ideas?
Why is it so horrific to finally achieve something someone works incredibly hard for? Is that self-inflicted pressure has nowhere else to go when the goal is captured? Or that any goal of our imagination cannot possibly be fulfilling if eventually reached? For example, LaMont's fixation with fame, not likely an unusual aspiration among the tennis players, cannot be life-fulfilling in the end, but are there other life goals that do manage to sustain life, like trying to beat an addiction. Maybe the goals in question must be an ongoing perpetual process as rehab is made out to be. And for tennis to be fulfilling, it must be played for the game rather than for its trappings, "The true opponent, the enfolding boundary, is the player himself" (84).
The NaCN-Quik kiid won the Pacific Coast Hardcourt Boys competition unexpectedly, which would subject him to "unprepared-goal-attainment-trauma."
I think you're right about the need for a goal to be ongoing in order to sustain life. If your only goal in life is to achieve a ranking or fame, once you do so, there's nothing left for you. But if your goal is to progress, maintain sobriety, enjoy the game, etc., then there's still something to live for.
Earlier I was talking with someone about the Greek notion of a "fatal flaw". From what I understand, this is something like when somebody has a particular focus, attribute etc, that is their downfall-- their fatal flaw. For Joelle it is her beauty, for LaMont Chu it is his quest for fame-- his desire to be on magazines. I'm trying to comment on your goal topic with this. Is it that some of their goals-- their fantasies-- ultimately become their fatal flaw?